RecruiterGTMRecruiterGTM

    The Recruitment Market Pulse · Edition 01 · August 2026

    The fee model is moving.
    Here is the data.

    Monthly research for owners of small and medium recruitment agencies. Every number is linked to its source, the full report is free, and it reads in about 8 minutes.

    Published 1 August 2026 · Next edition: 1 September 2026

    3.5–4.5x

    Agencies using AI anywhere in their workflow are 3.5–4.5x more likely to have grown revenue than those that do not.

    Bullhorn GRID 2026, survey of ~2,300 recruitment professionals

    -11%UK permanent placements in 2025, stabilising into 2026REC / APSCo
    -8.5%US staffing sales year-on-year, Q3 2025American Staffing Association
    35% vs 12%Fall in cost-per-sourced-candidate vs cost-per-hire with AI sourcingBullhorn GRID 2026
    ~10%Of firms have AI embedded across their whole workflowBullhorn GRID 2026

    TL;DR

    Six things to know this month

    01 · Sentiment Check

    What the industry is saying

    The debate about whether to productise is over among the people who shape opinion in this industry. The conversation has moved to how fast.

    The contingent, multi-listed perm market is over.
    Greg Savage — 4x agency founder, now runs 98% retained with a 90% close rate

    What this means for your agency

    If your desk is 100% contingent, you are on the wrong side of where every credible voice says the market is going. You do not need to abandon contingent. You need it to become your entry tier, not your business model.

    02 · Who's Winning With What

    The four fee models, honestly compared

    Contingent

    Under pressure

    15–25% of salary, 20% typical. Generalist fees being squeezed by PSLs; specialist fees holding. Still right for volume desks and as the trust-builder with new clients.

    Retained / Engaged

    Holding firm

    25–35% with milestone billing. The boutique specialist’s model — works when your value is judgment and market insight, not speed. One documented case: £8K generalist fees to £132K retained searches in under two years.

    Subscription / Embedded

    Fastest growing

    Monthly recurring, typically $5K–$20K/mo. Went mainstream in 2026 for companies hiring 3+ roles a year — they trade percentage fees for one predictable number. RPO-style recurring models are growing at roughly 16% a year.

    Hybrid menu

    The winning shape

    Contingent as the entry tier, retained for critical roles, subscription for recurring need. Agencies offering the menu are beating single-model firms — the client picks the tier, not whether to use you.

    03 · The Numbers That Matter

    Every figure sourced and dated

    3.5–4.5xRevenue-growth likelihood for firms using AI anywhere in the workflow · Bullhorn GRID 2026
    56%Of surveyed recruitment firms grew revenue in 2025; 13% grew more than 25% · Bullhorn GRID 2026
    -35% / -12%AI cut cost-per-sourced-candidate 35%, but cost-per-hire only 12% — sourcing is commoditised, conversion is not · Bullhorn GRID 2026
    50%Of agency owners across our 82-member RecruiterGTM community find Claude Code friendlier and easier to understand and run than tools like Clay or n8n · RecruiterGTM community data, August 2026
    -11%UK permanent placements in 2025, with the rate of decline slowing into 2026 · REC / APSCo
    -8.5%US staffing sales year-on-year in Q3 2025 ($28.1B) · American Staffing Association
    ~35%Share of Korn Ferry fee revenue that is now recurring rather than transactional · Korn Ferry reporting, 2025
    80–140bpsMargin compression that pushed the large staffing firms away from contingent in a single year · Industry filings, 2024–25
    24% vs 59%Only 24% of companies plan to add recruiter headcount in 2026, while 59% plan to increase TA technology spend — corporates are automating TA, not rebuilding it · SHRM / HR.com surveys, via Pin State of TA 2026
    47.5%Share of all US job growth in 2025 that came from healthcare, on just 11.4% of total employment — the widest shortage-to-capacity gap of any sector · Indeed Hiring Lab, Nov 2025

    Every figure above comes from a named primary source — links in the Sources section. Stats we could only find on vendor blogs were left out. The 50% Claude Code figure is the exception by design: it is RecruiterGTM's own community data, the one number in this report we measured ourselves.

    04 · Where the Market Is Heading

    Four shifts that will outlast the cycle

    1. The AI divide is compounding

    The revenue gap between AI-adopting and non-adopting firms jumped from 25–40% in 2024 to 3.5–4.5x in 2026, and only about 10% of firms have AI running through their whole workflow. The upside is still wide open for small agencies that move now.

    2. Sourcing is commoditised; conversion is the moat

    Anyone can find candidates cheaply now. The agencies getting paid are the ones who engage, convert and close them — candidate experience, speed to shortlist, offer management, market advice. That is also why specialist retained fees are holding while generalist contingent fees fall.

    3. Recurring revenue is eating transactional

    Embedded and RPO-style models are growing at roughly 16% a year while in-house teams armed with AI tools handle commodity hiring themselves. The agencies that thrive will look less like CV suppliers and more like operating partners with monthly relationships.

    4. Corporates are automating TA, not rebuilding it — and that picks your target industries

    After the 2023–24 TA layoffs, internal teams are staying lean: only 24% of companies plan to add recruiter headcount in 2026, while 59% plan to raise TA technology spend and corporate HR-tech investment ran $4.93B through Q3 2025, up 20% on the year. Lean internal benches plus acute shortages is the agency-friendly combination, and it points at healthcare (47.5% of all US job growth in 2025 on 11.4% of employment, and the only UK sector with rising permanent demand per REC), cybersecurity, manufacturing and mid-market tech for Q3–Q4. The harder rooms to sell into: tier-1 tech firms building specialist internal TA for AI talent, and mature in-house functions like legal.

    What this means for your agency

    Plan for a 2027 where a percentage fee on a single placement is your smallest product, not your only one. The window to reposition while competitors hesitate is roughly now — remember, 90% of firms still have not wired AI through their workflow.

    05 · The Playbook

    Four moves for this month

    1

    Write your offer menu — two main offers plus a backup

    Why now: Single-model agencies are losing to menus. The client should pick a tier, not decide whether to use you.

    This month: One page: your niche, two main offers anchored on what already makes you the most money, one backup offer built from what clients ask you for beyond placements, pricing and one guarantee you can honour.

    2

    Pick your escape route from the PSL race

    Why now: On a preferred supplier list, five agencies compete on price and speed. Retained and embedded work is won on relationships outside it.

    This month: List your five most valuable client relationships. For each, identify one critical or recurring hiring need where you could propose an engaged or monthly model instead of another contingent race.

    3

    Move one hour a day from sourcing to conversion

    Why now: Cost-per-sourced-candidate fell 35%; cost-per-hire barely moved. The bottleneck — and the fee — is in converting, not finding.

    This month: Audit where your desk time went last week. Automate or delegate the sourcing hours; reinvest them in candidate engagement, client feedback chasing, and offer management.

    4

    Put one AI workflow live end to end

    Why now: Firms with AI anywhere in the workflow are 3.5–4.5x more likely to be growing. Only ~10% have gone end to end — early-mover advantage is still real.

    This month: Pick one workflow (candidate re-engagement, follow-up chasing, or weekly pipeline reporting), wire it up with an AI layer, run it for the full month, measure replies and hours saved.

    06 · Sources

    Check our working

    Methodology: compiled from primary industry reports, practitioner interviews and podcasts published in the last 90 days. Vendor-published statistics are excluded unless corroborated by a primary source.

    Where RecruiterGTM fits

    The research is free. The systems are what we build.

    Everything above points the same way: agencies win by pairing a productised offer with AI-run systems for outbound, sourcing and content. That is what we install — Claude-powered engines inside recruitment agencies, delivered in 90 days.

    The Recruitment Market Pulse is published on the 1st of every month by RecruiterGTM. · All editions